"Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly

Abstract The phenomenon of asylum has existed since time immemorial and today in the 21st century is still one of the most important problems of the world community. Asylum is as old as human social life and a solution has been provided in every history and society according to the traditions and culture of that society. Throughout history, man has always tried to provide a suitable shelter to survive in the face of some natural and unnatural threats. Anyone who, for whatever reason, risks his or her life or rights has the right to seek refuge in another country. The existence of complete rules and regulations regarding asylum in jurisprudence, explicit reference to Quranic verses, Islamic traditions and jurists' opinions on the right to asylum and the importance and explanation of refugee rights are among the reasons for its comparative study with the 1951 Geneva Convention. Refugee rights are also emphasized in international law. Asylum in Islamic jurisprudence is also one of the institutions and rights that is referred to as "rent and safety". Despite the emphasis and formation of conventions and the adoption of various measures on asylum, due to the lack of enforcement guarantees in this regard, the host refugee states do not consider themselves obliged to comply with these provisions. This article, with an analytical-descriptive approach, comparatively examines the rights of asylum in jurisprudence and the 1951 Geneva Convention.

Abstract Globalization is an inevitable process, which is internationalization and the elimination of geographical boundaries. The thinkers and thinkers of different countries each speak in a way about the world and there is little consensus about it. Today, globalization is the most obvious trend in the convergence of countries, the most important of which is the economic dimension. On the other hand, citizen's rights are now at the national and international level as important legal issues. Meanwhile, the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran focuses on the rights of citizens and does not include differences in ethnicity, race and language in this right. In this paper, we attempt to analyze the globalization and its effects on citizenship rights, while defining the concept of globalization comprehensively, the challenges of globalization, as well as its positive and negative consequences in relation to citizenship rights. Take up The effects of globalization on citizenship rights and ways to promote citizenship rights in the age of globalization have been described and explained. The research hypothesis is that "the evidence suggests the positive impact of globalization on the citizenship rights.