"Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly

Abstract The present article is entitled "The views of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani on the word "la" in the rule of the prohibition of detriment " which examines the opinions of these two thinkers about the rule of rule of the prohibition of detriment and their interpretation of the word "la". Here, an attempt has been made to answer the questions raised by Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani about the explanation of the rule of the prohibition of detriment. For this purpose, the jurisprudential and principled works of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani and their opinions have been taken into consideration. At first, the concepts and definition of rule of the prohibition of detriment have been examined with emphasis on the approach of Sheikh ansari and Akhund Khorasani. Then, the views of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund about the word "la" at the beginning of the rule of the prohibition of detriment are discussed and their similarities and differences are stated. Finally, by proving the superiority and superiority of Sheikh Ansari's point of view over the akhunds point of view, the perception and scope of the application of the Harm Rule has been examined and criticized from the perspective of Sheikh Azam and the akhund. In short, this research explained the views and opinions of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani about the rule of the prohibition of detriment and the interpretation of the word "la" and reviewed and criticized them.

Abstract Human actions are divided into three parts: worships, traditions, and habits. The religion commandments are wajeb, mustahab, Makruh, Mabah, and Haram. In this article, we are dealing with the worship subject which leads to the man's proximity to God and future life reward. Because, a charged person must know whether he can change the worship subject or not and if doubts are raised in the subject of worship, which principle should be cited in order to put the charged person out of doubt. The jurisconsults believe that the "Esalatossehhe" is applicable in transactions and habits which in this article the possibility of citation to this principle in worship from the Sunnis jurisconsults point of view will be studied. Also, different Sunnis religion disagreements over the issue of invalidity and corruption in the worship and various opinions on this issue and also types and conditions of worship and corruption-related effects in worship is discussed. Then with the citation to available sources, we will be dealing with the citation Impossibility to the "Esalatossehhe" and the Sunnis jurisconsults reasons In the field of worship. In the end, their obeyed principle in worship which is “Esalatol man” will be disputed.

Abstract "Naszas" is one of the most important terms in the term "Imamieh jurisprudence" and "Islamic law", which means withdrawal from the obedience of the husband and wife to each other. Since Islam ordered the formation of the family and caused it to keep people calm and calm, in order to reach this peace and quiet, it has been suggested to the couples that the solutions in legal and legal texts, in the form of duties and duties of the couples Are relative to each other. The Holy Qur'an recommends that tolerance and consistency between the parties be initiated by the couple, in the event of differences between the couples by ordering to follow ethical and educational principles such as: passing, loyalty, popularity, peace, marriage and mercy. If the title of the research comes to light, what has been investigated is the rights and duties of couples and their disapproval of their duties and the solution to the problem of coping with each partner. Therefore, due to an approach tailored to the needs of the community and the family institution in the current society, these disadvantages should be resolved with respect to the desirable relationships between the husband and wife.

Abstract Human rights are those rights that human beings enjoy because of being human beings, regardless of the circumstances of the social variable or the degree to which they are individually competent. The answer to this assumption is that there is a series of norms, principles, and rights that are universally applicable and applicable to all human beings in different societies, since all individuals have rights for human beings without any society or government Can not deny them. For this reason, they have stated in the definition of human rights: "Human rights are the general privileges that every human being naturally possesses. Imam Sajjad (as) has been mentioned in three books of "Towaf al-Qoul" by Ibn Shubra Harari (381 AH), "Man La Yehzayar al-Fakheh" and "Al-Hayal" by Mohammad bin Ali ibn Babaroyi, known as Sadouq (382 AH). What is contained in this essay is in fact the expression of tasks that a person has in relation to different individuals, so it may be argued that this treatise does not mean the rights of today's rights. But it can be said that given that these duties have been raised to all people in the community and everyone can have such a request, these duties can be expressed in the form of a statement of the "general rights" from the viewpoint of Imam Sajjad.