In recent years, justice as a jurisprudential rule has been the subject of some jurisprudence scholars' efforts to leverage jurisprudence and move jurisprudence from isolation to efficiency and address the challenges of executing sentences. With a new look at justice and its application in different traditions of jurisprudence, they aim to build upon the jurisprudence of jurisprudential rules and to organize the inference of religious law based on it and to integrate this rule into the current methods of jurisprudence. The pervasive rules that overwhelm all the jurisprudence of the jurisprudence, and even to some people's opinion, can even overrule the verdicts! This paper proves that the criminal justice of the oppressor is effective in the process of ijtihad in such a way that the jurisprudent can use it as a means of measuring one's jurisprudence by reasoning one's jurisprudence. The purpose of the present study is justice and its validity in Imamiyyah jurisprudence. Justice is the issue of justice. That is why believers are obliged to observe the condition of justice in the selection of the Imam of the congregation as well as in the regulation of their religion and demands, the testimony and testimony of one another, and so on. In other words, the believers are obliged to follow the path. To live their life in all micro and macro, personal and social, worldly and worldly ways of justice and to avoid cruelty and cruelty,