Judgment decline is conducted in different ways and various instruments, in which the claim or judgment extraditions are one of those acts, and the request made by the principal claimant or any tribunal claims in order to eliminate the effect of a dispute formally consent and adduce by the court and judicial authority and has almost the same effects that arranges in petition extradition, so that after the claim extradition at its juncture and legal section, not only will be taken out of court its proceedings and jurisdiction assignment, but also the defendant(s) is also exempt from the obligation to answer and defend against propounded claim, and the court will issue the abatement of action. In condition of the claim extradition, the issue of termination of claim has also been considered and if the plaintiff wants to completely dismiss her/his claim, in this case, the termination of claim order will be issued. According to this approach, the purpose of this research is a comparative extradition study and termination of claim in Iran, French and British laws.
salimian,A. and maleki,J. (2018). Comparative Approach for Extradition and Termination of Claim. "Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly, 1(2), 7-23.
MLA
salimian,A. , and maleki,J. . "Comparative Approach for Extradition and Termination of Claim", "Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly, 1, 2, 2018, 7-23.
HARVARD
salimian A., maleki J. (2018). 'Comparative Approach for Extradition and Termination of Claim', "Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly, 1(2), pp. 7-23.
CHICAGO
A. salimian and J. maleki, "Comparative Approach for Extradition and Termination of Claim," "Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly, 1 2 (2018): 7-23,
VANCOUVER
salimian A., maleki J. Comparative Approach for Extradition and Termination of Claim. "Adl va Ensaf" Comparative Law Researches Quarterly, 2018; 1(2): 7-23.
